NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Michael Barone :: Townhall.com Columnist
Job-Killing Policies Could Doom Democrat Hopes
by Michael Barone
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What grade would you give Barack Obama so far as President?




"The level of unemployment is unacceptably high. And will, by all forecasts, remain unacceptably high for a number of years."

Who do you suppose said that? A Republican political operative? A Fox News political analyst? One of those several hundred thousand Tea Partiers who assembled in Washington on Sept. 12? No, it was Lawrence Summers, the director of Barack Obama's National Economic Council and, by common consent, one of the world's leading economists.

Arguing with Idiots By Glenn Beck

Summers made this gloomy forecast in the course of arguing that our economy is headed to "sustained recovery." And while it sounds like self-protective political rhetoric, it is also in line with the thinking of Democratic economists who bemoaned a "jobless recovery" during the first Bush term.

They argued then that a variety of factors -- big increases in the incomes of high earners, the crowding-out of wage increases by the fast-rising costs of health insurance -- prevented the rapid job growth that followed previous recessions. There was something to these arguments.

But it's also true that job creation accelerated in 2004 and kept going for another three years. Perhaps, although Democrats would not like to admit it, the Bush economic policies had something to do with that.

And perhaps the rather different policies of the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress may help Summers' gloomy predictions come true.

Tax policy is one example. The Bush tax cuts are scheduled to expire next year, and the Democratic Congress will surely allow income tax rates on high earners to go up to 39.6 percent again, or even more if it enacts the administration's proposed policy of limiting high earners' charitable deductions.

These increases will produce revenue that the government needs to reduce the enormous budget deficit, though surely not as much revenue as static economic models indicate. But they will also depress economic growth to some non-trivial extent, and thereby depress job creation.

Then there's trade protectionism. A week ago Friday, late at night, the Obama administration slapped import tariffs on Chinese tires. The Chinese retaliated by imposing tariffs on auto parts and chickens -- take that, United Auto Workers and Tyson Foods! Upshot: American consumers will pay more for tires, and auto-parts and chicken-processing jobs will be at risk. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Barone is a Fox News Channel contributor and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics. He is Senior Political Analyst for the Washington Examiner and a Resident Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Fox News Channel contributor and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Michael Barone's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
elko-mike
The Chinese can't mow my lawn and maintain my landscape at all. So that's one example of a service job they can't perform, let alone more cheaply. I'm not sure what point you are making with this argument. If we can get goods or services cheaper from China, then we should do so.

The term service was meant to refer to the Insurance and banking industry. Clearly the Chinese have the comparable advantage for low and medium skilled labor but we have the advantage in the insurance and banking sector which would allow many Americans a job opportunity not necessarily having to travel to China and live there.

This trade imbalance has led to the debasement of our dollar . If there was free trade as I stated earlier such as we had with Germany , the Chinese yuan would have appreciated much sooner and the Chinese consumers would have been buying many more products from the US . Yet we have sacrificed our low and medium skilled jobs while at the same time allowing the Chinese to protect and thereby build up there fledging financial industry . You tell me that I should take advantage of the cheap products they sell me but I am telling you that I do not want their cheap products at the expense of our low and medium skilled workers if the chinese do not open up all their markets to us just as we have opened up our markets to them.

To diverge I will ask you to respond to my comment about why the US government pressured
the Japanese gevernment not to allow Mitsubishi to build commercial jet airliners. I remember the issue in the 1980s . Surely the Japanese have the skill and know-how and capital to build commercial jet airliners. Do conquered nations not enjoy the same free trade that the conquerors enjoy ?

DEFENSE CONTRACTORS HAD DAY MADE
ON THIS CONSTITUTION DAY THE WORLD GOT ALOT SCARIER, THE ACTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT WAS THAT OF A COWARD. DOES HE BELIEVE EVERY COUNTRY IS GOING TO LOVE THE UNITED STATES? WHY WOULD NOT AN AGGRESSOR JUST COME AND OVERTAKE THE NATION IF IT IS GOING TO CRATER TO AGGRESSION.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Keep up-to-date with your local Dallas KSKY community.
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.