NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Michael Medved :: Townhall.com Columnist
Lives of Toil and Stress, Not Self Indulgence
by Michael Medved
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What grade would you give Barack Obama so far as President?




In pop culture, images of wealthy executives usually connect the execs with yachts and swimming pools, golf-courses and ski lodges, Gulfstreams, and absurdly expensive restaurants. A more accurate portrayal would emphasize long hours, BlackBerry interruptions, punishing stress, lost sleep and missed family occasions. In ground-breaking work, Dalton Conley, chair of the sociology department at New York University, reveals that “it is now the rich who are the most stressed out and the most likely to be working the most. Perhaps for the first time since we’ve kept track of such things, higher-income folks work more hours than lower-wage earners do.” In the New York Times (September 2, 2008) he cited a study by economists Peter Kuhn and Fernando Lozano, showing that since 1980 the number of men in the bottom fifth of the income scale who work long hours (defined as more than 49 hours per week) dropped by half. At the same time, long weeks for the top fifth of earners increased a painful 80 percent.

“Today, the more we earn the more we work, since the opportunity cost of not working is all the greater,” Conley concludes. “In other words, when we get a raise, instead of using that hard-won money to buy ‘the good life,’ we feel even more pressure to work since the shadow costs of not working are all the greater.” A supporting study by Daniel Hammermesh and Jungmin Lee shows that women with higher incomes (purportedly leading pampered lives and relying on hired help) actually report feeling more stressed than women with lower incomes. More money doesn’t necessarily produce more comfort and leisure, but increases the sense of responsibility and challenge—the desire to use every available moment in a productive and beneficial way.

Daniel Gross, insightful and fearless columnist for Newsweek and Slate (and a repeat guest on my radio show) reached similar conclusions in a fascinating piece, “No Rest for the Wealthy,” in the New York Times Book Review (July 5, 2009). “In the contemporary money culture, to be at leisure, to be idle, is to be irrelevant… A great many people can afford not to work and could spend their time shuttling between multiple homes, eating fabulous meals and playing golf. Yet they continue to work around the clock… Among Type-A, self-made members of the leisure class, there’s a sort of reverse prestige associated with leisure.” Gross noted that the yearly World Economic Forum at the glorious Alpine resort of Davos allowed few of the movers and shakers to relax. “At Davos, which is filled with conspicuous consumers, the only people who ski are the journalists.”

In other words, an all-consuming ethic of effort and a constitutional allergy to wasted time contribute significantly to the well-publicized success of most leaders of American business. These CEO’s, as well as most middle managers, affirm the eternal connection between economic advancement and hard work.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Medved's daily syndicated radio talk show reaches one of the largest national audiences every weekday between 3 and 6 PM, Eastern Time. Michael Medved is the author of eleven books, including the bestsellers What Really Happened to the Class of '65?, Hollywood vs. America, Right Turns and, most recently, The Ten Big Lies About America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Michael Medved's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
economic advancement and hard work

It is a shame that the political class, the liberals and dems., believe its luck not as stated in the subject.
The current system permits the lazy to sit on their fat tails and through the gun of government steal, rob and cheat those who produce.
There is no obligation required of the takers. They receive and have no duty to try. The takers are protected by the gun and force of government. Under government the takers have a right to steal, cheat, and receive what is not owned by them.
We have two classes in this country: 1. the producers and 2. the takers.(takers are those who are supported generation after generation)

paranoidmystic replied to
"Greed" is an unreasonable desire to possess more than one deserves. Therefore, it isn't greedy to keep what you've produced. Working long hours also is irrelevant to greed.

It's those clamoring for medical services, food, clothes, homes, and respect they haven't earned that are greedy.

And how about those with a pathological hunger for power over others? And what of those with an aversion to work who desire unearned leisure? Greed isn't limited to material objects.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Keep up-to-date with your local Dallas KSKY community.
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.