NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Wednesday, June 04, 2008
Richard H. Collins :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Road to Hell is Paved With Democrats
by Richard H. Collins
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What grade would you give Barack Obama so far as President?




So the general election has begun. Oh sure, Hillary hasn’t formally dropped out yet and neither party has had their convention yet. But last night John McCain and Barack Obama made it clear that they have switched their attention towards each other.

Obama claimed the mantle of the Democratic nomination, which he had secured not by primary votes alone but by the special party elders, known as superdelegates, and took time to accuse McCain of running for the third term of President Bush. McCain, speaking before Obama, pointed out that despite Obama’s constant mantra of change, and obvious rhetorical skills, he mostly offers standard liberal big government solutions not real change.

It is a truism that the candidate who can define his opponent generally has the upper hand. Yet, it remains true today and both candidates have already begun that battle.

Obama’s unique persona and talents will have to be countered with a laser focus on his leftist views and radical history. If the race comes down to speaking ability, or likeability, Obama will win.

No amount of charm, however, will change the fact that Obama is the most liberal candidate for president in a generation. He is a committed leftist with historical ties to radical organizations and parties. He offers nothing but the failed big government solutions of the past dressed up with fancy words and vague symbolism. This is the battle that must be engaged.

Obama makes a lot of promises. He promises universal health care where everyone has coverage whatever the circumstances and yet costs go down. But it doesn’t take an economist to figure out that this is an expensive project and no amount of technology can magically give people free health care. Someone will have to pay more. Michelle Obama admitted as much, remarking on the campaign trail:

“The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more.”

Take a wild guess who that someone is going to be. If you said American taxpayers you guessed right. Obama, like all Democrats, promises to only raise taxes on the “rich.” But once the reality of the budget – including all the new spending he proposes – hits, it is amazing how flexible that term can become. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Richard H. Collins is the founder of StopHerNow.com, a website dedicated to educating the public about Hillary Clinton’s liberal record.

Be the first to read Richard H. Collins’s column.
Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Sign up today
Listen to what Obama says
and how often he says it and in different ways. He is obsessed with solving poverty which is a good thing. However, he wants to do it with the money of the working voters and he wants to do it around the world as well as in our country. Even his definition of a good nominee for the supreme court has to do with having a good heart and the right feelings.

I don't know if he is a marxist but I do know from the company he keeps, he is angry at America and far from seeing it as imperfect, he wants to remake it according to his own and other radicals views. He is telling us this not just in words but in associations and in what he isn't saying.

A dilemma is that voters cannot be sure of his words because even those change when it is politically expediant for them to change. We have ample evidence of that in how he has dealt with the church and the Rev. Wright problem as well as Israel etc.

Curious
as to why I see NO major headlines on Townhall about the Calif. Supreme Court's decision NOT to grant a STAY to petitoner's asking that the gay marriage ruling be delayed until Novemeber?

The Supreme Court essentially blew (no pun intended) them off. Thus, gay marriages will be legal starting June 17. This is going to create a constitutional nightmare due to the Full Faith Clause. Other states that have amendments AGAINST such marriages are NOW going to have to defend their own laws. This should be a no-brainer however, as the Ca. Supreme Court's ruling is just an "interpretation" of ONE particular case.

Nowhere in the law of the land does it state that a "court ruling" becomes legislated law. Legislatures have this function. The Supreme Court's decision simply needs to be ignored or NOT enforced by the Executive Branch (Arnie), thereby rendering the Supreme Court's decision meaningless (except for the original plaintiff).
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Keep up-to-date with your local Dallas KSKY community.
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.